아세안
연구정보
The age of reinvented empire(s) in Africa in the light of Persian hegemonic power: Reading the books of Deuteronomy and Ezra-Nehemiah in the context of Zimbabwe
짐바브웨 국외연구자료 기타 Ndikho Mtshiselwa (Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies, University of South Africa) University of Pretoria, Centre for Ministerial Development of the Dutch Reformed Church (Exelsus) 발간일 : 2016-08-31 등록일 : 2016-08-31 원문링크
자료이용안내
국내외 주요 기관에서 발표하는 자료들을 수집하여 제공하고 있습니다. 수록 자료의 자세한 내용은 해당 기관으로 문의하시기 바랍니다.
It is generally accepted that historically Africa experienced colonialism. Thus, in the neocolonial age articulated by the likes of Sugirtharajah, Segovia and Nkrumah, most African countries are faced with the challenge of power struggle in which imperialism and dictatorship inhibits the development of the Two-Thirds world countries. This challenge, it is argued, reveals an imperialistic tendency of the European Union, China and African government(s) to alter democracy and freedom. As such, the Zimbabwe context, amongst others, will be used as a main point of reference. This article examines the elements of imperialism in African states in the light of Persian hegemonic power in the books of Deuteronomy and Ezra-Nehemiah. It investigates whether or not the Jews were free under the Persian hegemonic influence in the post-exilic period. The comparison of the influence of Persian hegemony in the books of Deuteronomy and Ezra-Nehemiah with the evidence of imperialism in African government(s), leads to the argument that certain African states do not appear to be completely democratic and free.<br /><br /><strong>Intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary implications:</strong> Based on aspects of Old Testament and political science studies, this article explores traces of imperialism in African governments in the light of Persian hegemonic power in the Hebrew Bible. In the end, the article argues that certain African states, for instance Zimbabwe, should not be considered as completely democratic and free nations.
본 페이지에 등재된 자료는 운영기관(KIEP) 및 AIF의 공식적인 입장을 대변하고 있지 않습니다.